More on Position Papers

As you prepare for conference, your position paper will be one of your most indispensable tools. Not only will you use your position papers to solidify your position and arguments in committee, but you will also find the process of writing and researching for your position papers to be rewarding in and of itself. This case, while being somewhat complicated, is also deeply fascinating and I hope you guys get to see some of that through your research.

The first of the three major sections of the position paper is Historical Background. Here, you’re expected to show clear understanding of the key events leading up to and during the Russo-Georgian war of 2008, around which our case revolves. In order to effectively demonstrate this, you must highlight the intricate political dynamic between not only the main parties involved, Georgia and Russia, but also the maneuvering around the regional governments of South Ossetia and Abkhazia, who also serve as major players in this conflict. Consider the motivations of these key parties when making your analysis as well. Don’t forget to include the events surrounding the actual application by Georgia to the court in your paper as well.

The second section of the position paper is the Initial Rulings section. This is one of the most important sections as it will lay the foundation for your position in committee and, more importantly, for you to eventually develop your arguments for committee. In order to provide an effective opinion, reference evidence to back up your claims and remember to cite your sources at the end. Remember that the initial rulings you provide here are only primary impressions after research; your opinions can and will change after debating and engaging with witness testimony in committee.

When answering the Questions to Consider in your final section, be analytical about using the information you acquire in your research. These questions aren’t intended to stump you guys, but rather are intended to serve as a means to further your thinking about the case. Take into account the various perspectives of the case when answering the questions. After all, every effective judge is able to look at a case from multiple perspectives to make the best-informed decision.

Don't be afraid to reach out if you have any questions. Good luck to you all!!!

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tensions in South Ossetia

Image
Hi delegates! This blog post will be reviewing the role of South Ossetia in the conflict between Georgia and Russia, specifically focusing on the events of 2008 and ethnic conflict within the region.                 For reference, South Ossetia is located along the Georgian-Russian border. Separatist sentiments have been brewing within South Ossetia since the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991. The region of Ossetia, as seen in the map, is split between Georgia and Russia. Both North and South Ossetia are primarily occupied by Ossetians, a unique ethnic group which speaks neither Georgian nor Russian. However, South Ossetia had a significant population of ethnic Georgians living within the region before the conflict; the treatment of ethnic Georgians in the region is one of the central issues which our case will be studying.                 While South Ossetia and Abkhazia are both contested territories, South Ossetia is unique because it is located near the Georgia
Read more

Legal Terms for Georgia v. Russia

Hi Delegates!  I hope your February has gotten off to a spectacular start.  By now, you've hopefully begun perusing materials related to Georgia v. Russia , and more likely than not have been encountering a thick web of legalese to sort through while you research.  Have no fear--below is a short list of a few of the most relevant legal terms to know to make your reading a bit easier and your understanding of the case a bit better. Prima facie: based on the first impression.  This is generally a fact or circumstances that are accepted as established unless proven otherwise.  Example: "...the Court explains that it is for it to determine prima facie whether a dispute within the meaning of Article 22 of CERD exists." ( Request for the indication of provisional measures, ICJ Summary of the Order , 4)  Provisional measures: Provisional measures for protection are interim, or temporary orders issued by the ICJ that are roughly analogous to restraining orders.  Issued orde
Read more

Verdicts: What are they and how do they work?

Image
One of the key differences between the ICJ and other committees is that the ICJ does not concern itself with resolutions. Instead, as judges of the court, you will be expected to formulate Verdicts at the end of debate. Verdicts are documents that judges of the ICJ use to declare their ruling on the case. Just as a resolution is a reasoned reflection of one’s stance in committee, so too is the Verdict the culmination of arguments and evidence made throughout the course of the conference. In order to form your Verdicts, you will form a group of 4 or 5 with other fellow judges and write your Verdicts during unmoderated caucus sessions in the latter part of committee. Verdicts in the ICJ at BMUN should be comprised of three primary sections: Overall Ruling, Evidence, and Legal Precedent and Implications. The Overall Ruling section deals with presenting your group’s ruling in terms of the four Levels of Guilt**. Here, explicitly address the Levels of Guilt your group has chosen to app
Read more